$heriff Tom
Administrator
Groom ba ya ya ya
Posts: 16,173
|
Post by $heriff Tom on Mar 19, 2007 13:09:19 GMT -5
Emma Watson, better known as "Hermione" has opted out of the last 2 Potter flicks, although Daniel Radcliffe just recently signed on for them. Apparently "no money would be enough" to get her to return, she is "tired of being that girl from Harry Potter."
Rupert Grint admitted to a UK newspaper that this was no surprise, and he and Dan Radcliffe were not really on speaking terms with her outside of filming.
|
|
MSBNYY
Administrator
El Guapo
Posts: 15,545
|
Post by MSBNYY on Mar 19, 2007 16:04:32 GMT -5
This was being talked about months ago. Stupid move by Hermione. Does she really think that people will forget the role if she opts out of the last 2 films?
She is stuck with that rep no matter what.
And she just cost herself millions.
She's hot though.
|
|
|
Post by Domi on Mar 19, 2007 16:21:45 GMT -5
Oddly enough, I now have little desire to see the last two films. Rupert is still the HNIC, though.
|
|
$heriff Tom
Administrator
Groom ba ya ya ya
Posts: 16,173
|
Post by $heriff Tom on Mar 19, 2007 17:07:09 GMT -5
I'm sure she'll make her millions. And if things are not going the way she wants, she'll start to undress in front of the cameras. Its an easy way to make money.
|
|
MSBNYY
Administrator
El Guapo
Posts: 15,545
|
Post by MSBNYY on Mar 19, 2007 17:09:27 GMT -5
Funny part is, I think a lot of people are expecting the old Playboy spread.
|
|
|
Post by cactusjames on Mar 19, 2007 18:04:49 GMT -5
What is she like 16 or 17? In a few years Hef will get her.
|
|
|
Post by Ms. Jericho on Mar 22, 2007 19:39:36 GMT -5
I WANNA MEET RUPERT!!!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by Jackass on Mar 22, 2007 21:27:50 GMT -5
She is a cunt.
|
|
|
Post by Domi on Mar 22, 2007 23:40:02 GMT -5
You take that back.
|
|
$heriff Tom
Administrator
Groom ba ya ya ya
Posts: 16,173
|
Post by $heriff Tom on Mar 26, 2007 19:57:26 GMT -5
USA TODAY reported in todays edition that Emma Watson WILL return as Hermione for these final two movies. So there you go.
|
|
|
Post by thecaptain15 on Mar 26, 2007 21:42:07 GMT -5
Follow the $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
|
|
|
Post by Jackass on Mar 26, 2007 21:49:11 GMT -5
She is a bigger cunt, now.
|
|
|
Post by grover on Mar 26, 2007 21:53:24 GMT -5
And, she's not that hot.
|
|
MSBNYY
Administrator
El Guapo
Posts: 15,545
|
Post by MSBNYY on Mar 26, 2007 21:59:38 GMT -5
She's pretty damn hot. Hottest underage chick since Winnie Cooper.
|
|
|
Post by grover on Mar 26, 2007 23:33:07 GMT -5
Not impressed.
|
|
MSBNYY
Administrator
El Guapo
Posts: 15,545
|
Post by MSBNYY on Mar 27, 2007 6:07:01 GMT -5
And she's not impressed with you either.
|
|
$heriff Tom
Administrator
Groom ba ya ya ya
Posts: 16,173
|
Post by $heriff Tom on Mar 27, 2007 7:19:58 GMT -5
Not true. She finds him funny.
|
|
MSBNYY
Administrator
El Guapo
Posts: 15,545
|
Post by MSBNYY on Mar 27, 2007 7:21:54 GMT -5
No she doesn't. She has taste, but she feels sorry for him.
|
|
|
Post by cactusjames on Mar 27, 2007 9:41:22 GMT -5
Um hottest underage chick of the past few years goes to the Olsen Twins, Sharapova too since she was on 17 when she won wimbledon but now is legal. Winnie has to be in her 30s and you're saying the Potter bitch is the hottest since her? There's been better looking young chicks since Winnie fucking Cooper. Come to think of it, she had a skinny ass head and didn't get hot till recently. I'd rather fuck the girlfriend on Boy Meets World.
|
|
MSBNYY
Administrator
El Guapo
Posts: 15,545
|
Post by MSBNYY on Mar 27, 2007 9:46:05 GMT -5
I didn't watch Boy Meets World, but I think I know who you're talking about. I wasn't a fan of hers. Point taken on the Olsen Twins.
|
|
|
Post by cactusjames on Mar 27, 2007 10:32:27 GMT -5
Yeah the chick on BMW got a little on the chunky side, then lost it, but gained it back after she found out Lance Bass was gay, with whom she had a relationship with a while back. Pretty funny stuff there.
|
|
|
Post by Jackass on Mar 27, 2007 12:28:57 GMT -5
Since she's into gay dudes, maybe you have a chance with her, Cactus Serge.
|
|
|
Post by cactusjames on Mar 27, 2007 13:23:37 GMT -5
Or maybe if she didn't have a twat smell like old egg salad.
|
|
$heriff Tom
Administrator
Groom ba ya ya ya
Posts: 16,173
|
Post by $heriff Tom on Dec 31, 2007 11:30:57 GMT -5
Not sure where to put this, could not find another active Harry Potter thread. Is there anyone in the world actually surprised by this news?
FOXNEWS.COM HOME > ENTERTAINMENT J.K. Rowling May Write Eighth Harry Potter Book
Reports that the Harry Potter book series was dead may have been premature.
Although the seventh Potter novel was published last January amid much fanfare as the final book in the beloved series, author J.K. Rowling has said in recent interviews that an eighth book is not out of the question.
According to a report Sunday in London's Daily Mail, Rowling said she has "moments of weakness" when she feels drawn to revisit the character, and that her biggest fan — her teen daughter Jessica — has been urging her to write another Potter book.
Rowling, 42, said that if she should decide to continue the series, the next book would not focus on Harry Potter as the main character.
|
|
MSBNYY
Administrator
El Guapo
Posts: 15,545
|
Post by MSBNYY on Dec 31, 2007 11:41:39 GMT -5
That would be awesome. But I wonder when she would set it.
|
|
|
Post by Ms. Jericho on Dec 31, 2007 19:18:31 GMT -5
I think she was a moron to include that weak epilogue in the last book.
I don't think focusing on another character would be bad. And there is plenty of opportunity for prequels. Though I don't know how those would go over.
|
|
MSBNYY
Administrator
El Guapo
Posts: 15,545
|
Post by MSBNYY on Dec 31, 2007 19:58:37 GMT -5
The problem with prequels is that we know where everything is going. Maybe some continuation that takes place a few years later, but well before the epilogue.
Maybe she'll do Neville Longbottom: IN SPAAAAAACE!!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by Ms. Jericho on Dec 31, 2007 20:33:42 GMT -5
That is true. But there can't be much to write about afterward either. Because of that stupid epilogue we kind of know how things are going to go too. Then again, she already covered a lot of the backstory in The Half Blood Prince. I don't see how another book is really going to work.
|
|
MSBNYY
Administrator
El Guapo
Posts: 15,545
|
Post by MSBNYY on Dec 31, 2007 21:14:00 GMT -5
She's one of the best writers in the world. She can make it work. The adventures of Harry's parents would be cool, but since we know how that turns out, I don't know how great that would be.
I can see them coming up with a new threat as big as Voldemort, and dealing with it. Or they could center the story on the next generation, and deal with Harry's kids.
As long as McGonnagal is in it, it's all good.
|
|
$heriff Tom
Administrator
Groom ba ya ya ya
Posts: 16,173
|
Post by $heriff Tom on Feb 29, 2008 7:51:23 GMT -5
Party-pooper.
FOXNEWS.COM HOME > ENTERTAINMENT J.K. Rowling Sues Fan for Unauthorized 'Harry Potter Lexicon'
NEW YORK — As the creator of the Harry Potter books sees it, her kindness to fans might come back to haunt her.
In papers filed for a lawsuit in Manhattan, J.K. Rowling says she feels betrayed by a fan, Steven Vander Ark, for his role in trying to publish an unauthorized reference work, "Harry Potter Lexicon."
Ark is editor of a Web site containing a fan-created collection of essays and encyclopedic material on the Potter universe, including lists of spells and potions found in the books, a catalog of magical creatures and a who's who in the wizarding world.
Rowling said she was especially irked that the site's owner and the lexicon's would-be publisher, RDR Books, continued to insist that her acceptance of free, fan-based Web sites justified the efforts.
"I am deeply troubled by the portrayal of my efforts to protect and preserve the copyrights I have been granted in the Harry Potter books," she wrote in court papers filed Wednesday in a lawsuit she brought against the small Muskegon, Mich., publisher.
She said she intends to publish her own definitive Harry Potter encyclopedia.
"If RDR's position is accepted, it will undoubtedly have a significant, negative impact on the freedoms enjoyed by genuine fans on the Internet," she said. "Authors everywhere will be forced to protect their creations much more rigorously, which could mean denying well-meaning fans permission to pursue legitimate creative activities."
She added: "I find it devastating to contemplate the possibility of such a severe alteration of author-fan relations."
RDR Books attorney Lizbeth Hasse said Thursday that Rowling is seeking a monopoly over the work, which is not part of copyright law.
"It's a very legitimate literary activity," she said of the lexicon. "Like a reference book or a guide to literature, it's a long-recognized genre. ... We are not replacing the novel or taking away the market."
Rowling brought the lawsuit last Halloween along with film company Warner Bros., which owns the intellectual property related to the Potter books and movies. The lexicon's publication, previously scheduled for Nov. 28, 2007, has been blocked by the lawsuit.
RDR Books publisher Roger Rapoport has said the lexicon would not compete with any official encyclopedia written by Rowling.
On its Web site, RDR Books said it was "determined to publish this book for the benefit of Harry Potter fans everywhere."
It said it "believes Ms. Rowling, who has championed the `Lexicon' for years, will love reading the book just as much as she does the Web site on which it is based."
In the past, Rowling had singled out the Web site and its editor for praise.
|
|