MSBNYY
Administrator
El Guapo
Posts: 15,545
|
Post by MSBNYY on Apr 11, 2010 17:50:54 GMT -5
Dummy, there was nothing in that treaty that gave up the right to use nuclear weapons against non nuclear countries no matter what.
You socialists are clueless.
|
|
|
Post by sean on Apr 14, 2010 12:20:01 GMT -5
|
|
MSBNYY
Administrator
El Guapo
Posts: 15,545
|
Post by MSBNYY on Apr 14, 2010 12:58:47 GMT -5
The DAILY SHOW? You're using the DAILY SHOW?
What's next, quoting Michael Moron? How about Jay Leno? Maybe he has some insights to add.
Again, this naive feeling that enemies like Iran and North Korea are going to be swayed by this treaty is just childish. This administration is clueless on foreign policy.
Not as much on healthcare, but clueless nonetheless.
|
|
|
Post by grover on Apr 14, 2010 13:55:11 GMT -5
The treaty is an extension of the one Papa Bush singed. It's pretty much 'We'll play nice to everyone but Iran'
You wouldn't know that because Republicans don't know anything but living in fear. How it feel to type under a blanket with a flashlight in your mouth because you're scared some black guy is going to come get you?
It's funny how you say nukes are a deterrent, but it doesn't deter terrorism, which is pretty much the only wars we're going to be in until the next Republican administration is in place to lie about another war for us to lose.
Face it, you're scared. Who is going to attack us now that we signed this treaty? Name them. Please. I dare you. You're a coward who will not address me head on because I will mop the floor with you.
Hey good thing Bush found Osama OOOPSSS!!!! llololollololol@!!
FAGGOTS~!! HECKLE HOUSE IS A COWARDS MESSAGE BOARD!!! IF REPUBLICANS ARE SO TOUGH DELETE THIS SHIT BOARD AND COME BACK TO 39!!!!
|
|
|
Post by sean on Apr 14, 2010 14:46:18 GMT -5
did you watch the video? the Daily Show did not make up things said by Ronald Reagan,. or Sean Hannity & newt gingrich. It also did not make up what is in the Treaty. If you actually watched the video, and are still arguing about this, I can see why noone else ever posts in this thread
|
|
MSBNYY
Administrator
El Guapo
Posts: 15,545
|
Post by MSBNYY on Apr 14, 2010 15:45:50 GMT -5
Again, the video is a liberal talk show comedian. That's like when Wil Ferrell was doing pro-Obamacare ads. It means nothing. Yes, I watched it. But this doesn't change that Obama the socialist wimp is reversing decades of nuclear policy and weakening our country.
The Republicans don't live in fear. Hell, domestically, fear mongering is all the democrats know to get votes. But democrats internationally are weak and stupid. Let's concede our defenses to the international community some more!
Hey, good thing Clinton took terrorism seriously when it was a lot less powerful than it is now! Good thing Obama is letting terrorists go home so they can go back to work! Let's read them some miranda rights and treat them like citizens! Wooohoo!
|
|
|
Post by sean on Apr 14, 2010 16:21:25 GMT -5
so you saw the part where Reagan said he dreams of a nuclear free world, and said he would like to start by eliminating 33% of our stockpile? You saw the part about countries like Iran and N. Korea not being part of the treaty? The part where we respond to a biologiocal weapons threat? The part where Gingrich and Hannity willfully distort what Obama said? Or where Hannity lies yet again, along with Palin and Bachmann? For fucks sake, this is nothing like a will Ferrell Pro-Obamcare ad. This is hard proof, in their own words, that Gingrich, hannity, Palin, bachmann and Fox News as a whole, are all not just liars or stupid, but they are all so desperate for power that they will lie about anything to get a few votes from the dumbest people in America. Anyone who believes them, whether it be "Death Panels" or letting Iran nuke us and not responding, has got to be pretty dumb
|
|
MSBNYY
Administrator
El Guapo
Posts: 15,545
|
Post by MSBNYY on Apr 15, 2010 7:44:53 GMT -5
Everybody DREAMS of a nuclear free world. The difference is that morons like Obama will weaken OUR country to try to make that happen as countries like Iran and North Korea laugh at his weakness.
Do you understand that Reagan was a major part of the collapse of the USSR because of defense spending? You can only accomplish peace through strength. You don't get it by leading by example. Turning the other cheek gets both cheeks slapped. If Obama was President in the 1980s, the cold war would still be going on (unless of course Obama just surrendered to the Russians).
Obama already courted and got the dumb vote. Or the socialist vote. All we got out of this White House is the downfall of our healthcare system, a weakened foreign policy, and out of control spending that could bankrupt this nation.
Spend now, tax later.
It's disgusting, and people still drink his kool aid.
|
|
|
Post by heartybooooo on Apr 15, 2010 8:10:15 GMT -5
I'm not as specifically bothered by the treaty. However, I am concerned with the general approach to foreign policy which seems to be to suck up and hope that this will show we are good people and that maybe they can like us. Hate to break it to you, but Palestine and others in the Middle East including Iran will never like us. The way we have treated Israel recently is quite unfortunate as well.
And as for health care, the biggest distortion was the "deficit neutral" crap. Of course it will be deficit neutral in the first 10 years when you have 10 years of the taxes associated with it and only 5 years of the spending.
Finally, I hope everybody takes a good, hard look at his or her tax return and sees how much you have paid in income taxes this year. It is a sobering reality. This does not include all the sales taxes, real estate taxes and the various fees we pay for everything from DMV, to airplane tickets, to cell phones. Do you feel you are getting your money's worth?
|
|
MSBNYY
Administrator
El Guapo
Posts: 15,545
|
Post by MSBNYY on Apr 15, 2010 8:58:38 GMT -5
There's nothing deficit neutral about the healthcare debacle. Nothing backs that up.
|
|
MSBNYY
Administrator
El Guapo
Posts: 15,545
|
Post by MSBNYY on May 19, 2010 9:35:34 GMT -5
online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703315404575250264210294510.htmlRemember when Obama said you will likely be able to keep your health plan after his socialist agenda was railroaded through Congress against the wishes of the American people? Well, Premier Obama lied. =================== President Obama guaranteed Americans that after health reform became law they could keep their insurance plans and their doctors. It's clear that this promise cannot be kept. Insurers and physicians are already reshaping their businesses as a result of Mr. Obama's plan. The health-reform law caps how much insurers can spend on expenses and take for profits. Starting next year, health plans will have a regulated "floor" on their medical-loss ratios, which is the amount of revenue they spend on medical claims. Insurers can only spend 20% of their premiums on running their plans if they offer policies directly to consumers or to small employers. The spending cap is 15% for policies sold to large employers. This regulation is going to have its biggest impact on insurance sold directly to consumers—what's referred to as the "individual market." These policies cost more to market. They also have higher medical costs, owing partly to selection by less healthy consumers. Finally, individual policies have high start-up costs. If insurers cannot spend more of their revenue getting plans on track, fewer new policies will be offered. View Full Image obama1 AFP/Getty Images obama1 obama1 This will hit Wellpoint, one of the biggest players in the individual market, particularly hard. The insurance company already has a strained relationship with the White House: Earlier this month Mr. Obama accused Wellpoint of systemically denying coverage to breast cancer patients, though the facts don't bear that out. Restrictions on how insurers can spend money are compounded by simultaneous constraints on how they can manage their costs. Beginning in 2014, a new federal agency will standardize insurance benefits, placing minimum actuarial values on medical policies. There are also mandates forcing insurers to cover a lot of expensive primary-care services in full. At the same time, insurers are being blocked from raising premiums—for now by political jawboning, but the threat of legislative restrictions looms. One of the few remaining ways to manage expenses is to reduce the actual cost of the products. In health care, this means pushing providers to accept lower fees and reduce their use of costly services like radiology or other diagnostic testing. To implement this strategy, companies need to be able to exert more control over doctors. So insurers are trying to buy up medical clinics and doctor practices. Where they can't own providers outright, they'll maintain smaller "networks" of physicians that they will contract with so they can manage doctors more closely. That means even fewer choices for beneficiaries. Insurers hope that owning providers will enable health policies to offset the cost of the new regulations. Doctors, meanwhile, are selling their practices to local hospitals. In 2005, doctors owned more than two-thirds of all medical practices. By next year, more than 60% of physicians will be salaried employees. About a third of those will be working for hospitals, according to the American Medical Association. A review of the open job searches held by one of the country's largest physician-recruiting firms shows that nearly 50% are for jobs in hospitals, up from about 25% five years ago. Last month, a hospital I'm affiliated with outside of Manhattan sent a note to its physicians announcing a new subsidiary it's forming to buy up local medical practices. Nearby physicians are lining up to sell—and not just primary-care doctors, but highly paid specialists like orthopedic surgeons and neurologists. Similar developments are unfolding nationwide. Consolidated practices and salaried doctors will leave fewer options for patients and longer waiting times for routine appointments. Like the insurers, physicians are responding to the economic burdens of the president's plan in one of the few ways they're permitted to. For physicians, the strains include higher operating costs. The Obama health plan puts expensive new mandates on doctors, such as a requirement to purchase IT systems and keep more records. Overhead costs already consume more than 60% of the revenue generated by an average medical practice, according to a 2007 survey by the Medical Group Management Association. At the same time, reimbursement under Medicare is falling. Some specialists, such as radiologists and cardiologists, will see their Medicare payments fall by more than 10% next year. Then there's the fact that medical malpractice premiums have risen by 10%-20% annually for specialists like surgeons, particularly in states that haven't passed liability reform. The bottom line: Defensive business arrangements designed to blunt ObamaCare's economic impacts will mean less patient choice.
|
|
MSBNYY
Administrator
El Guapo
Posts: 15,545
|
Post by MSBNYY on May 19, 2010 12:16:25 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by sean on May 22, 2010 2:32:16 GMT -5
wow, so Linda McMahon somehow got the CT GOP Nomination for Senate, and her opponent is the jackass who lied about his service in Vietnam. I'd say Linda has no shot, but:
I thought she had no shot in the GOP Primary, esp. against the financial expert, Peter Schiff
Voters don't care for politicians lying about serving in Nam, or any other war. We'll put up with your lies when it comes to just about everything else. You're a politician, lying is in the job description.But for fucks sake, don't lie about serving in the military, going to war, and taking credit and glory for what men and women far braver than you ( and me) did.
|
|
MSBNYY
Administrator
El Guapo
Posts: 15,545
|
Post by MSBNYY on May 22, 2010 8:46:56 GMT -5
I would be extremely surprised if McMahon pulls it off. The bump makes sense because the scandal just broke out, but in the end, she's a rookie politician in a blue state.
|
|
$heriff Tom
Administrator
Groom ba ya ya ya
Posts: 16,173
|
Post by $heriff Tom on May 23, 2010 9:32:21 GMT -5
May 23, 2010 | 1:11 AM ET
Republicans Win Seat in Democratic Stronghold
The streak ends at 11.
For the first time since, May, 2008, House Republicans have won a special election.
Republican Charles Djou topped Democrats Colleen Hanabusa and former Rep. Ed Case (D-HI) to succeed retired Rep. Neil Abercrombie (D-HI) in Congress. Before Djou’s victory, Democrats had won 11 consecutive special elections. The stretch included a win last Tuesday by Rep. Mark Critz (D-PA) to succeed the late-Rep. Jack Murtha (D-PA). Many political handicappers expected Republican Tim Burns to win that contest and viewed the race as a barometer for how the political winds may blow this fall.
Djou secured 39.5 percent of the vote. Meantime, the two Democratic candidates, Hanabusa and Case combined to score nearly 60 percent of the vote. But that splintered the Democratic impact and allowed Djou to squeak through.
Republicans are still reeling from Tuesday night’s defeat in Pennsylvania and sought to portray this as a repudiation of President Obama on his home turf. Mr. Obama is a native of Hawaii and lived in that Congressional district as a child.
“Eighteen months ago, President Obama carried this district with seventy percent of the vote,” said Rep. Pete Sessions (R-TX), the head of the National Republican Congressional Campaign Committee (NRCC). “Charles Djou’s victory not only changes the makeup of the House of Representatives, but it helps Republicans move one step closer toward winning back the majority in November.”
Intra-party squabbles split the Democratic vote in the race as loyalists failed to unite behind one candidate. Many Hawaii Democrats hold much contempt for Case. Former Hawaii Gov. Ben Cayetano (D) tried to dissuade Case from running for Congress after the late-Rep. Patsy Mink (D-HI) died. Cayetano wanted Mink’s husband to fulfill the remainder of his wife’s term. Case ran anyway and won. Case further infuriated the party when he challenged longtime Sen. Daniel Akaka (D-HI) in a primary four years ago.
The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) dropped out of the race two weeks ago, conceding the race to Republicans. In an interview with FOX, DCCC Chairman Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) expressed confidence that Democrats would take the seat in November. But he said it wasn’t worth spending cash now when the state party was locked in internecine warfare.
“It’s a Democratic seat,” said Van Hollen.
Djou becomes only the third Hawaiian to represent the state on Capitol Hill. Former Rep. Pat Saiki (R-HI) served in Congress in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Sen. Hiram Fong (R-HI) was one of the state’s original senators.
Djou is expected to be sworn-in later this week. The House will then have 432 members: 255 Democrats and 177 Republicans. There are vacancies for the seats once held by former Reps. Nathan Deal (R-GA), Eric Massa (D-NY) and Mark Souder (R-IN). Souder just resigned Friday due to a sex scandal with a part-time aide.
Abercrombie left Congress at the end of February to run full-time for governor.
|
|
MSBNYY
Administrator
El Guapo
Posts: 15,545
|
Post by MSBNYY on May 24, 2010 9:37:09 GMT -5
|
|
MSBNYY
Administrator
El Guapo
Posts: 15,545
|
Post by MSBNYY on Jun 29, 2010 9:47:16 GMT -5
Governor Patterson has done a much better job being the governor once he actually started to govern. It shows that even a blind man can see that you can't spend money you don't have.
|
|
|
Post by withspades on Jul 16, 2010 15:22:47 GMT -5
|
|
MSBNYY
Administrator
El Guapo
Posts: 15,545
|
Post by MSBNYY on Sept 9, 2010 9:53:25 GMT -5
cnsnews.com/news/article/72404Obama has added more to the national debt in his 19 months in office than all the previous presidents from George Washington to Ronald Reagan, combined. Of course, that's Bush's fault I'm sure....
|
|
|
Post by grover on Sept 11, 2010 18:12:09 GMT -5
>CNSNews.comTypical Republican pussies.
|
|
MSBNYY
Administrator
El Guapo
Posts: 15,545
|
Post by MSBNYY on Sept 11, 2010 20:44:07 GMT -5
Ah...attack the link--not the facts.
Try reading where the numbers come from...
The Congressional Budget Office.
Larry David can't make it all right.
Obama has made Bush look like Thomas Jefferson.
|
|
|
Post by grover on Sept 12, 2010 0:48:01 GMT -5
Funny that it doesn't list how or why that happened, right?
You know why It's Bushs fault? Because Hecklehouse has 2 posts a day and is a board born of fear.
Nobody likes republicans. No one. The world hates you.
|
|
MSBNYY
Administrator
El Guapo
Posts: 15,545
|
Post by MSBNYY on Sept 12, 2010 8:00:25 GMT -5
Of course not. There's a reason for that. We're not weak socialists who are destroying this country with overspending, while catering to terrorists and completely destroying our health care system.
You know why it's Bush's fault? Because unlike Clinton, he never fought back against his critics, and let all the attacks on him go unanswered, which led to the democrats getting absolute power over this country, and quadrupling the deficit in a YEAR.
|
|
|
Post by sean on Sept 12, 2010 15:41:37 GMT -5
The DAILY SHOW? You're using the DAILY SHOW?
Ah...attack the link--not the facts.
HYPOCRITE
how much of that deficit is Bush's tax cuts for millionaires & billionaires? How much is from 2 unaccounted for wars? You must want to eliminate the Bush tax cuts since you are so anti-defict, eh?
|
|
|
Post by grover on Sept 12, 2010 16:32:39 GMT -5
How much of that is the Prescription Drug Act? That has been a DISASTER!! Hell even the poster boy for the GOP Paul Ryan says the tax cuts won't pay for itself.
The Bailout was voted on by Republicans and singed off by Bush. He's as much to blame as everyone.
What the fuck is Bush supposed to say? It's ok we wasted billions in making Iraq unstable, on a war based on lies? Sorry for making Iran more powerful?
You ran with a horseshit article with cherry picked numbers. Notice how that 'fact' didn't end up on any other news source.
You guys just want to go 'Ha ha, told ya so, Republicans win!' and not run the country right. That's why you're all faggots who are scared of anyone with dark skin.
No one likes you. The only reason Republicans will win big in November is because Democrats are stupid and don't know what the fuck they are doing, and Independents won't bother going out to vote. Then the Republicans will enter power and throw a hissy fit and shut down the Government and suck rich CEO's cocks.
Shut down Hecklehouse and rejoin Section 39 if you're so fucking tough. You won't? Typical. Rpublicans are only good at losing wars int he middle East.
|
|
MSBNYY
Administrator
El Guapo
Posts: 15,545
|
Post by MSBNYY on Sept 12, 2010 19:12:16 GMT -5
I love how much you bash Bush, but the fact is, Obama has been much worse.
And I hate to break it to you, but the democrats have been running this country since 2006, when they took over Congress. Bush merely prevented disasters like the health care plan.
These are numbers from the CBO that just show what an irresponsible nut job who can print money and has no clue what he's doing.
YOU ARE RIGHT--the DEMOCRATS ARE STUPID AND DON'T KNOW WHAT THEY ARE DOING.
CEOS>the Government.
This health care plan is the single worst piece of legislation in the history of this country. Almost 60 percent of the population still want it REPEALED.
I'd rather have 100000 Iraqs than this moronic health bill.
If the Republicans win it will be because Obama and his socialist cronies have gone too dictatorial and it's backlash.
I'm not scared of people with dark skin. Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and their liberal peons are as white as you and I. I'm scared of an overbearing intrusive government that considers any form of capitalism evil, and think that taxing the rich while spending more money than any other administration is the way to go. Morons.
Great job!
|
|
|
Post by grover on Sept 13, 2010 10:14:38 GMT -5
>Republicans >Not scared of black people Republicans are scared of EVERYONE!! Every Republican is a pussy, from now until the end of time. Scared of gays, scared of blacks, scared of Muslims. A black guy is elected president and they want to riot. Reagan can get a pass for 'not knowing' his staff was selling arms to Iran and contras but Obama tells kids to stay in school and work hard and it's brainwashing. Republicans are greedy and disgusting and have contributed nothing of value culturally, ever. The health care bill is such a piece of shit even thinking it will cost us anything shows how much you know about it. You know as much about politics as you do the National League. Obama and the Democrats have done plenty wrong, but you're here parroting Right wing TV. You're not pointing out what they are doing wrong in reality, you are being a retard, like every single republican on the face of the planet. You have no desire to see the country run correctly, you just want to say you're in charge. Saying you would take that many Iraq wars and the wasted lives and trillions it will cost us instead of a health care bill that will pretty much do nothing and help no one, shows you're an idiot. The fact that Republicans consider owning a gun a right but health care a privilege shows how disgusting you are, and why the entire globe laughs at you. The entire world thinks you're faggots,a nd rightfully so. How's that make you guys feel? LOL!!! FAGGOTS!!! EVERYONE HATES YOU!!! YOU WILL NEVER BE POPULAR, AND ALL THE HOT GIRLS WANT TO DRINK AND DO DRUGS WITH US MODERN THINKERS !!! OH QUICK GO GET YOUR GUN FAGGOT!!! I'M A REPUBLICAN AND I NEED AN ASSAULT RIFLE BECAUSE MUSLIMS AND BLACKS ARE GOING TO GET ME!!! LOLOL PUSSIES!! Go suck some CEO's cock. Even Bohner said he'd be willing to sign of a Bush Tax cuts extension if it were middle class only, which would be the right thing to do. Hecklehouse sucks and it is example #1 why Republicans are pussies. Enjoy your 2 posts a week. Speak to me when you know how to win a war in the Middle East.
|
|
|
Post by grover on Sept 13, 2010 10:32:50 GMT -5
"The best ally in the struggle against violent Islamism is moderate Islam. The unfounded attacks on the backers of Park51 and others, along with such sideshows as a pastor calling for the burning of Korans, give substance to the Al Qaeda argument that the U.S. is waging a war against Islam, rather than against the terrorists' misshapen effigy of that religion. Those stirring the pot in this debate are casting a spell that is far more dangerous than they may imagine."
This of course is the argument that Imam Rauf has taken to making in recent days. But like oversexed teenagers ramped up into an escalating excitement by a pornography of hate, the anti-mosque cheerleaders have transmogrified this wisdom into a threat on Rauf's part, that if his project is denied his his radical Muslim (non) allies will inflict more attacks on America. 'Now Rauf is threatening us with more attacks!'
It really does amount to obscenity.
Republicans = Pussies
Hecklehouse = pussy board
|
|
MSBNYY
Administrator
El Guapo
Posts: 15,545
|
Post by MSBNYY on Sept 13, 2010 11:31:21 GMT -5
Democrats==BIGGER pussies.
Obama fucked up the country far more than Bush ever did.
And moderate Islam? Cut the shit. This guy won't even comment on whether the funding for his mosque comes from terrorist nations.
And if he were so moderate, he wouldn't have blamed 9/11 on the US, nor would he still INSIST on building the mosque in the shadow of ground zero.
The fact is, people are trying to use Freedom of Religion as a means to cower to terrorists.
Someone who claims to represent moderate Islam would actually GET why this is such an issue. If this were about Freedom of Religion, people would be talking about no mosque at all. But they aren't. People are simply angry at the location. Move the thing a few blocks away and no one would give a shit.
The amount of disrespect this Imam has for 9/11 is apparent by his stance.
9/11--Never Forget--unless you're a liberal.
|
|
|
Post by sean on Sept 13, 2010 16:50:25 GMT -5
then why did W send him on so many US government backed missions? Didn't hear about that on FoxNews, did you?
|
|